The Widest GH coverage
Super Hot Lagon student Exposed(Video inside)
The Video has been brought back so you can watch miss Ghana showing her sexy goods to her ugly bf on cam
looks like an angel right?? Yawa nkoaa
Add a Comment
-
Comment by E! on October 10, 2011 at 12:34 -
@ Game is real (fake)....your words are meaningless. You are not real, and I know this for a fact! You will see, mark my words.
-
Comment by game is real on October 10, 2011 at 11:52
-
look E! go and find something better to do....... you got all tht info from tht hoe.....who really cares like i said i didn upload i could have and didn....... but y'all wanna re-ignite all this bull shit..... i know the games is real muthafucker hope u do to nigga/bitch now fuck off cock-sucker
-
Comment by E! on October 10, 2011 at 11:45
-
East Legon, GIMPA Student, mom's restaurant in E. Legon, Oxford street, don't worry we know were to find you. Oh and no pun intended but this is not a game, and this real.
-
Comment by game is real on October 10, 2011 at 11:42
-
hhmmm there you go making threats your not legally that smart are you..........well im gonna ignore you from now on lol........you talking tough but hiding behind the name E! tell me who u are bitch and lets get it on..........
-
Comment by E! on October 10, 2011 at 11:37
-
Look AJ, we all know you are not tough, your parents have a lil $, and you hide behind your dads name. This is the real world though, real people, and your parents are not going to help you with this one. You might as well go back to the UK to drink tea, because as far as I'm concerned there is a bounty on you.
-
Comment by game is real on October 10, 2011 at 11:36
-
You should really stop making such dumb comments "by the way our uncle is a supreme court judge in Ghana!"......so what you gonna circumvent the Ghanaian legal system?.........see u soon would love to see this play out in court....have a counter suit already prepared ask she'll tell u...lol
-
Comment by E! on October 10, 2011 at 11:32
-
@ DECREIS and @ THE GAME IS REAL (FAKE) Read the elements of Online Defamation Law carefully, you dumb fucks...by the way our uncle is a supreme court judge in Ghana!
-
Comment by game is real on October 10, 2011 at 11:30
-
@ E! check the laws you dumb muthafucker its called the internet.......did you read the disclaimer lmao........you her brother tot she was a only child...........hmmmmm..weird world we live in lol......why u wanna jump me when i aint ready...scared of a fair fight.....dick head........
-
Comment by E! on October 10, 2011 at 11:29
-
Here is the law: Online Defamation Law
The Bloggers' FAQ on Online Defamation Law provides an overview of defamation (libel) law, including a discussion of the constitutional and statutory privileges that may protect you.
What is defamation?
Generally, defamation is a false and unprivileged statement of fact that is harmful to someone's reputation, and published "with fault," meaning as a result of negligence or malice. State laws often define defamation in specific ways. Libel is a written defamation; slander is a spoken defamation.
What are the elements of a defamation claim?
The elements that must be proved to establish defamation are:
a publication to one other than the person defamed;
a false statement of fact;
that is understood as
a. being of and concerning the plaintiff; and
b. tending to harm the reputation of plaintiff.
If the plaintiff is a public figure, he or she must also prove actual malice.
Is truth a defense to defamation claims?
Yes. Truth is an absolute defense to a defamation claim. But keep in mind that the truth may be difficult and expensive to prove.
Can my opinion be defamatory?
No—but merely labeling a statement as your "opinion" does not make it so. Courts look at whether a reasonable reader or listener could understand the statement as asserting a statement of verifiable fact. (A verifiable fact is one capable of being proven true or false.) This is determined in light of the context of the statement. A few courts have said that statements made in the context of an Internet bulletin board or chat room are highly likely to be opinions or hyperbole, but they do look at the remark in context to see if it's likely to be seen as a true, even if controversial, opinion ("I really hate George Lucas' new movie") rather than an assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion ("It's my opinion that Trinity is the hacker who broke into the IRS database").
What is a statement of verifiable fact?
A statement of verifiable fact is a statement that conveys a provably false factual assertion, such as someone has committed murder or has cheated on his spouse. To illustrate this point, consider the following excerpt from a court (Vogel v. Felice) considering the alleged defamatory statement that plaintiffs were the top-ranking 'Dumb Asses' on defendant's list of "Top Ten Dumb Asses":
A statement that the plaintiff is a "Dumb Ass," even first among "Dumb Asses," communicates no factual proposition susceptible of proof or refutation. It is true that "dumb" by itself can convey the relatively concrete meaning "lacking in intelligence." Even so, depending on context, it may convey a lack less of objectively assayable mental function than of such imponderable and debatable virtues as judgment or wisdom. Here defendant did not use "dumb" in isolation, but as part of the idiomatic phrase, "dumb ass." When applied to a whole human being, the term "ass" is a general expression of contempt essentially devoid of factual content. Adding the word "dumb" merely converts "contemptible person" to "contemptible fool." Plaintiffs were justifiably insulted by this epithet, but they failed entirely to show how it could be found to convey a provable factual proposition. ... If the meaning conveyed cannot by its nature be proved false, it cannot support a libel claim.
This California case also rejected a claim that the defendant linked the plaintiffs' names to certain web addresses with objectionable addresses (i.e. www.satan.com), noting "merely linking a plaintiff's name to the word "satan" conveys nothing more than the author's opinion that there is something devilish or evil about the plaintiff."
Is there a difference between reporting on public and private figures?
Yes. A private figure claiming defamation—your neighbor, your roommate, the guy who walks his dog by your favorite coffee shop—only has to prove you acted negligently, which is to say that a "reasonable person" would not have published the defamatory statement.
-
Comment by E! on October 10, 2011 at 11:17
-
@ Decreis, if you don't remove this pic and you continue to post these pics of peoples daughters, sisters, etc with out their consent, this equals = defamation! You also have something coming to you in the form of legal liability!
© 2013 Created by Ghanaleak.
You need to be a member of Ghanaleak.Net to add comments!
Join Ghanaleak.Net